In-Car Surveillance Is Coming, but Not in 2027
TBPN

In-Car Surveillance Is Coming, but Not in 2027

April 28, 2026

Happy Tuesday.

We’re live on YouTube and 𝕏.

The current thing in tech and business is the WSJ piece reporting that OpenAI missed revenue targets, the backlash to the piece, and the ensuing AI stock selloff.

Today’s lineupIn-Car Surveillance Is Coming, but Not in 2027

by John Coogan

Alamy

There’s a viral story about in-car surveillance that needs a little clarification, and then a healthy amount of debate. The basic claim is as follows:

Every new car in the U.S. will be required by law to have tech that puts constant surveillance on the driver by 2027.

AI in your car will determine if you're sober and fit to drive, automatically turning off the vehicle if it determines you're a danger on the road.

Sounds scary, but the historical rationale is pretty reasonable. There are more than 10,000 alcohol-related deaths each year on U.S. roads, technology is getting better at detecting intoxication, and it’s getting a lot cheaper, so why not just ship a “drunk driver detection system” with every car from the factory? There are a bunch of potential downsides that we can get into, but it’s important to set the facts straight about where we actually stand today.

The core concept here is generally correct. Congress did pass a mandate directing NHTSA to create a standard for “advanced drunk-driving prevention technology” in new passenger vehicles. The 2027 date isn’t a hard deadline though. This law was passed back in 2024 and, in the actual law, it basically allowed for delays. The NHTSA only issues a binding mandate requiring automakers to actually roll this out when the tech is “ready” and the NHTSA currently says the tech is not ready.

In theory, the tech feels close, but the scale of the problem is so big that you can see why there is a delay here. Alcohol detection systems exist and are typically deployed for drivers with previous DUIs. The problem is that those little hoses you blow into are “active systems” and the law requires this particular system to be both “accurate” and “passive” - meaning it has to either measure blood alcohol concentration (BAC) via breath sensing, fingerprint reading (tissue spectroscopy), or a camera system. All of those seem like they might be close to roughly accurate right now, I’m sure most AI startups or university labs could whip something up at a hackathon, but the problem is accuracy.

Americans drive a lot. The rough estimate is almost a quarter trillion driving trips per year (basically all ~350M Americans take on average 2 trips every single day of the year). What that means in practice is that even if a system is 99.9% accurate, you’re looking at tens of millions of incorrect results every year. Also, since probably 99.99+% of driving trips are made sober, that means tens of millions of false positives where someone goes to start their car for their morning commute, they’re a little sleepy or wore some different cologne that day, the system flags them as intoxicated and prevents them from starting their car. Infuriating.

The tech will probably get there with enough time and effort, so it’s worth looking at who is in support and who opposes this. The mandate here was bipartisan, but there is starting to be a backlash from libertarian conservatives who are concerned about “Orwellian government-controls.” There’s one idea that cars would have a remote killswitch, which leads to a bunch of dystopian possibilities. Just to be clear, there’s no current provision giving the federal government, the police, or automakers a remote-control button to disable your vehicle, but it is possible that the end result of this process is a system with that exact capability.

The middle ground seems to be “pre-drive lockout” - where the car just won’t start, but that can still create scary hypothetical scenarios (you’re at the beach, have a few glasses of wine, and then tsunami warnings start blaring, for example).

I do not have short timelines for any of these changes, but I do think it’s another win for the fans of vintage and more analog vehicles. Doug Demuro of CarsandBids.com has talked a lot about the various breakpoints for key car eras: air cooled, manuals, non-hybrid, non-electric, etc. It’s not hard to imagine no remote-controlled cameras looking inside the passenger cabin becoming a new box to check when picking a vehicle.

Headlines

WSJ: OpenAI Misses Key Revenue, User Targets in High-Stakes Sprint Toward IPO

➞ OpenAI Newsroom responds to WSJ

➞ Tae Kim responds to WSJ: “This is the DeepSeek FUD debacle all over again.”

Et Tu, Brute? What Elon Musk’s Clash With Sam Altman Is Really About.

Reporter Michelle Kim livetweets Day 2 of Musk-OpenAI trial

The Verge: Google and Pentagon reportedly agree on deal for ‘any lawful’ use of AI

Kendall Jenner’s 818 Tequila Gets Investment From Fireball Maker Sazerac

Joby Aviation launches first eVTOL point-to-point flights in New York

TechCrunch: OpenAI could be making a phone with AI agents replacing apps

GPT user discovers the chatbot isn’t allowed to mention “goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user’s query.”

Patrick OShaughnessy interviews Paul Tudor Jones in new pod

Adobe teams up with Anthropic to serve Claude intelligence through Adobe Creative Suite

Autonomous spacecraft startup True Anomaly raises $650M Series D

United Arab Emirates Says It Will Leave OPEC in Blow to Oil Cartel

Posts of the Day

Subscribe now

View on original site ↗